0
selected
-
1.
The risk of COVID-19 death is much greater and age dependent with type I IFN autoantibodies.
Manry, J, Bastard, P, Gervais, A, Le Voyer, T, Rosain, J, Philippot, Q, Michailidis, E, Hoffmann, HH, Eto, S, Garcia-Prat, M, et al
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2022;(21):e2200413119
Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection fatality rate (IFR) doubles with every 5 y of age from childhood onward. Circulating autoantibodies neutralizing IFN-α, IFN-ω, and/or IFN-β are found in ∼20% of deceased patients across age groups, and in ∼1% of individuals aged <70 y and in >4% of those >70 y old in the general population. With a sample of 1,261 unvaccinated deceased patients and 34,159 individuals of the general population sampled before the pandemic, we estimated both IFR and relative risk of death (RRD) across age groups for individuals carrying autoantibodies neutralizing type I IFNs, relative to noncarriers. The RRD associated with any combination of autoantibodies was higher in subjects under 70 y old. For autoantibodies neutralizing IFN-α2 or IFN-ω, the RRDs were 17.0 (95% CI: 11.7 to 24.7) and 5.8 (4.5 to 7.4) for individuals <70 y and ≥70 y old, respectively, whereas, for autoantibodies neutralizing both molecules, the RRDs were 188.3 (44.8 to 774.4) and 7.2 (5.0 to 10.3), respectively. In contrast, IFRs increased with age, ranging from 0.17% (0.12 to 0.31) for individuals <40 y old to 26.7% (20.3 to 35.2) for those ≥80 y old for autoantibodies neutralizing IFN-α2 or IFN-ω, and from 0.84% (0.31 to 8.28) to 40.5% (27.82 to 61.20) for autoantibodies neutralizing both. Autoantibodies against type I IFNs increase IFRs, and are associated with high RRDs, especially when neutralizing both IFN-α2 and IFN-ω. Remarkably, IFRs increase with age, whereas RRDs decrease with age. Autoimmunity to type I IFNs is a strong and common predictor of COVID-19 death.
-
2.
Autoantibodies neutralizing type I IFNs are present in ~4% of uninfected individuals over 70 years old and account for ~20% of COVID-19 deaths.
Bastard, P, Gervais, A, Le Voyer, T, Rosain, J, Philippot, Q, Manry, J, Michailidis, E, Hoffmann, HH, Eto, S, Garcia-Prat, M, et al
Science immunology. 2021;(62)
Abstract
Circulating autoantibodies (auto-Abs) neutralizing high concentrations (10 ng/mL, in plasma diluted 1 to 10) of IFN-α and/or -ω are found in about 10% of patients with critical COVID-19 pneumonia, but not in subjects with asymptomatic infections. We detect auto-Abs neutralizing 100-fold lower, more physiological, concentrations of IFN-α and/or -ω (100 pg/mL, in 1/10 dilutions of plasma) in 13.6% of 3,595 patients with critical COVID-19, including 21% of 374 patients > 80 years, and 6.5% of 522 patients with severe COVID-19. These antibodies are also detected in 18% of the 1,124 deceased patients (aged 20 days-99 years; mean: 70 years). Moreover, another 1.3% of patients with critical COVID-19 and 0.9% of the deceased patients have auto-Abs neutralizing high concentrations of IFN-β. We also show, in a sample of 34,159 uninfected subjects from the general population, that auto-Abs neutralizing high concentrations of IFN-α and/or -ω are present in 0.18% of individuals between 18 and 69 years, 1.1% between 70 and 79 years, and 3.4% >80 years. Moreover, the proportion of subjects carrying auto-Abs neutralizing lower concentrations is greater in a subsample of 10,778 uninfected individuals: 1% of individuals <70 years, 2.3% between 70 and 80 years, and 6.3% >80 years. By contrast, auto-Abs neutralizing IFN-β do not become more frequent with age. Auto-Abs neutralizing type I IFNs predate SARS-CoV-2 infection and sharply increase in prevalence after the age of 70 years. They account for about 20% of both critical COVID-19 cases in the over-80s, and total fatal COVID-19 cases.
-
3.
Investigating the Relationship between Vitamin D and Persistent Symptoms Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection.
Townsend, L, Dyer, AH, McCluskey, P, O'Brien, K, Dowds, J, Laird, E, Bannan, C, Bourke, NM, Ní Cheallaigh, C, Byrne, DG, et al
Nutrients. 2021;13(7)
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Persistence of symptoms following COVID-19 infection is known as long COVID and occurs in up to a third of sufferers and can last for as long as 6 months post infection. Tiredness and reduced capacity to exercise are characteristic of long COVID, however why these symptoms persist in a handful of patients is unknown. Vitamin D deficiency is gaining attention for its potential to improve symptoms of tiredness, however there are few studies examining its relationship with long COVID. This observational study of 149 patients who had been diagnosed with COVID-19 aimed to determine the relationship between symptoms of long COVID, inflammation in the body and vitamin D levels. The results showed that fatigue was common, but there was no association between vitamin D levels and fatigue, inflammation, or capacity to exercise. Interestingly women were more likely to experience fatigue in this study. It was concluded that fatigue and reduced exercise capacity are independent of vitamin D in those who have had COVID-19. This study could be used by healthcare professionals to understand symptoms of long COVID, and that vitamin D may not be effective for those symptoms.
Abstract
The emergence of persistent symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection, known as long COVID, is providing a new challenge to healthcare systems. The cardinal features are fatigue and reduced exercise tolerance. Vitamin D is known to have pleotropic effects far beyond bone health and is associated with immune modulation and autoimmunity. We hypothesize that vitamin D levels are associated with persistent symptoms following COVID-19. Herein, we investigate the relationship between vitamin D and fatigue and reduced exercise tolerance, assessed by the Chalder Fatigue Score, six-minute walk test and modified Borg scale. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were used to evaluate the relationships. A total of 149 patients were recruited at a median of 79 days after COVID-19 illness. The median vitamin D level was 62 nmol/L, with n = 36 (24%) having levels 30-49 nmol/L and n = 14 (9%) with levels <30 nmol/L. Fatigue was common, with n = 86 (58%) meeting the case definition. The median Borg score was 3, while the median distance covered for the walk test was 450 m. No relationship between vitamin D and the measures of ongoing ill-health assessed in the study was found following multivariable regression analysis. These results suggest that persistent fatigue and reduced exercise tolerance following COVID-19 are independent of vitamin D.
-
4.
Persistent fatigue following SARS-CoV-2 infection is common and independent of severity of initial infection.
Townsend, L, Dyer, AH, Jones, K, Dunne, J, Mooney, A, Gaffney, F, O'Connor, L, Leavy, D, O'Brien, K, Dowds, J, et al
PloS one. 2020;15(11):e0240784
-
-
-
Free full text
Plain language summary
Tiredness is a common symptom of Covid-19; however, it is unknown if this fatigue persists once recovered. This observational study of 128 recovered Covid-19 patients aimed to determine if fatigue persisted after recovery and whether severity of disease could predict fatigue. The results showed that post Covid-19 fatigue was reported in more than half of the participants and was particularly pronounced in females and in those with depression. Severity of disease did not predict fatigue. It was concluded that fatigue appears to outlast infection and fatigue was independent of disease severity. This study could be used by health care practitioners to understand that fatigue is common even after recovery from Covid-19 infection and women and sufferers of depression are the most susceptible.
Abstract
Fatigue is a common symptom in those presenting with symptomatic COVID-19 infection. However, it is unknown if COVID-19 results in persistent fatigue in those recovered from acute infection. We examined the prevalence of fatigue in individuals recovered from the acute phase of COVID-19 illness using the Chalder Fatigue Score (CFQ-11). We further examined potential predictors of fatigue following COVID-19 infection, evaluating indicators of COVID-19 severity, markers of peripheral immune activation and circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines. Of 128 participants (49.5 ± 15 years; 54% female), more than half reported persistent fatigue (67/128; 52.3%) at median of 10 weeks after initial COVID-19 symptoms. There was no association between COVID-19 severity (need for inpatient admission, supplemental oxygen or critical care) and fatigue following COVID-19. Additionally, there was no association between routine laboratory markers of inflammation and cell turnover (leukocyte, neutrophil or lymphocyte counts, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein) or pro-inflammatory molecules (IL-6 or sCD25) and fatigue post COVID-19. Female gender and those with a pre-existing diagnosis of depression/anxiety were over-represented in those with fatigue. Our findings demonstrate a significant burden of post-viral fatigue in individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection after the acute phase of COVID-19 illness. This study highlights the importance of assessing those recovering from COVID-19 for symptoms of severe fatigue, irrespective of severity of initial illness, and may identify a group worthy of further study and early intervention.
-
5.
Non-pharmacological interventions for cognition in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.
Dyer, AH, Briggs, R, Mockler, D, Gibney, J, Kennelly, SP
QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians. 2020;(3):155-161
Abstract
Midlife Type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is an important yet often unrecognized risk factor for the later development of dementia. We conducted a systematic review to assess the efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions (namely diet, exercise and cognitive training) for T2DM on cognition. A search strategy was constructed and applied to four databases: EMBASE, Medline, CINAHL and Web of Science. Peer-reviewed journal articles in English were considered assessing the effect of exercise, dietary or cognitive training/stimulation-based interventions (or any combination of these) in patients with T2DM on cognition. Results were dual-screened and extracted by two independent reviewers. Of 4820 results, 3782 remained after de-duplication. Forty full-texts were screened and two studies were included in the final review. The first assessed the impact of a 10-year intensive lifestyle intervention on T2DM-related complications (Look-AHEAD study) and the second was a post hoc analysis of T2DM patients from a trial of a physical activity intervention in older non-demented adult with functional limitations (LIFE study). Whilst the Look-AHEAD study found no impact on diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or dementia, the LIFE study demonstrated beneficial effects on global cognitive function and delayed memory specifically in older adults with T2DM. There is insufficient evidence to fully assess the effect of non-pharmacological interventions on cognition in T2DM. Well-constructed trials must be designed to specifically assess the effect of non-pharmacological and multi-domain interventions for cognition in patients with T2DM in midlife. All trials examining interventions in T2DM should consider cognition as at least a secondary outcome.